Skip to content

Featured

SpaceShipOne

Mercury and SpaceShipOne: The Spacecraft

By Lee Goldberg

What’s at Stake:

In the beginning, US efforts in Space were largely driven by militaristic goals and the belief in US exceptionalism. Later, while those motivations still existed, the pioneer spirit and entrepreneurialism pushed further development.

In late 1958, the U.S. government’s fear of falling behind the Russians drove NASA to impose an ambitious schedule on the Mercury program that included the production of the capsules that would be used for the first crewed flight on May 5, 1961, and five subsequent missions, as well as several engineering prototypes.

Designed and integrated by McDonnell Aircraft, the vehicles’ compact structure provided just enough room to shoehorn in an astronaut and their space suit, along with the minimum complement of life support, communication, propulsion, and guidance systems needed to support brief forays into space.

Mercury’s aluminum and titanium structure was sheathed in panels made of Rene 41, a heat-resistant nickel-based alloy. The capsule was equipped with small hydrogen peroxide-powered thrusters that could orient the craft while in orbit and three solid-fuel retrorockets which could be fired to slow the craft down enough to fall towards Earth. The cone-shaped vehicle would reenter the atmosphere leading with its blunt circular base, protected by an ablative heat shield that used the same principles and technologies originally developed to enable ballistic nuclear warheads to survive the fiery conditions they would encounter on the way to their targets. Mercury’s nose contained three parachutes which would deploy after entering the lower atmosphere, further slowing the craft to make a relatively soft water landing where it would be plucked from the ocean by helicopters and delivered to a nearby ship.

Read More »Mercury and SpaceShipOne: The Spacecraft
Tech Execs Must Act to Avoid Chip Tariff Trap;

Tech Execs Must Act to Avoid Chip Tariff Trap

By Mike Markowitz

Donald Trump’s latest proposal to impose tariffs as high as 100 percent on semiconductors imported from Taiwan may sound like a straightforward solution to boosting domestic manufacturing, but for those who understand the complexities of the industry, it’s a reckless move that could do more harm than good.

Tech executives cannot afford to stay silent. Now is the time to engage with policymakers and educate them on the severe consequences such tariffs would have on the very companies they claim to be protecting.

Read More »Tech Execs Must Act to Avoid Chip Tariff Trap
DeepSeek: Stop the Panic

DeepSeek: Stop the Panic

By Bolaji Ojo

What’s at stake:

DeepSeek nearly sank Nvidia and other AI model players. Except DeepSeek itself is barely known by anyone, its true story still a mystery, and the likely impact on the artificial intelligence market undetermined. It won’t be the last enterprise to put a dent on the AI market, however, according to Market Traction’s Steve Carr who says many more such surprises are waiting in the wings, both in the West and in China.

The race for leadership of the artificial intelligence market got scrambled last week. The debut of China’s DeepSeek AI model sparked a selling frenzy on Wall Street as spooked investors dumped Nvidia and other AI-related stocks. The implications of DeepSeek’s platform are not clear, however. Not enough is known about how it was developed, meaning a full assessment of its market implications are months away.

What is clear is that DeepSeek’s AI model isn’t a result of any mega innovation in semiconductor or software processing, considering the Chinese company is leveraging resources from other models, including ChatGPT, and depended on chips from Nvidia Corp., the market’s leading vendor of AI semiconductors. This doesn’t take away from the disruptive effects DeepSeek has had on the market already, though. Other questions were raised in a webcast discussion with Steve Carr, founder of Markettraction.io and TalkingIoT.

Read More »DeepSeek: Stop the Panic
Mercury and SpaceShipOne: 40-years of Evolution

Mercury and SpaceShipOne: 40-years of Technical Evolution

By Lee Goldberg, Contributing Editor

What’s at Stake:

Technological evolution is about building on the foundations and lessons of the past. The heritage of the US Space Program is a testament to that evolution. There is great value in comparing and contrasting two groundbreaking “firsts.” Read the 3-part mission to learn more.

More than six decades ago, Alan Shepard became the first American in space aboard a Mercury capsule which was propelled into its suborbital flight by a rocket derived from the V2, a WWII-era ballistic weapon. Roughly forty years later, Mike Melvill piloted SpaceShipOne, a privately funded, air-launched, rocket-propelled vehicle to the edge of space, becoming the world’s first licensed commercial astronaut.

Although they served very different objectives and were separated by decades of technological advances, each project laid the foundations for the more advanced missions that followed. Surprisingly, Mercury and SpaceShipOne also shared several important elements that contributed to their missions’ success. In this first of a three-part series, we’ll look at both spacecraft to see how they were different and, especially, how they were similar.

Two Very Different Spacecraft – or were they?

At first glance, the Mercury capsule and SpaceShipOne appeared to have had little in common. 

Read More »Mercury and SpaceShipOne: 40-years of Technical Evolution
Eloy: The Future of Automotive is being Created in China

Eloy: The Future of Automotive is being Created in China

By Bolaji Ojo

Jean-Christophe Eloy has been closely involved in the electronics and semiconductor industries for several decades, during which period the founder and CEO of the Yole Group has observed a handful of transitions in the sector.

Another one is taking place now, according to Eloy, who says the current transformation of the technology world is multifaceted and deeper than previous ones because it encompasses most segments of the global economy. To further complicate the situation, the industry is also trying to wrangle down the disruptive impacts of geopolitical disputes and the uncertainties associated with the applications, investments and access to innovations in artificial intelligence, he noted.

In a webcast interview with editors of the Ojo-Yoshida Report, Eloy explored diverse topics of interest to the industry, ranging from AI to the increasing role of China in the semiconductor supply chain and the outlook for leading players like Nvidia and TSMC. He also delved into the fractious issue of how Taiwan’s relationship with China and the West will be resolved, suggesting that he sees a peaceful, negotiated resolution that while not pleasing to everyone would still be acceptable on a longer-term basis.

Read More »Eloy: The Future of Automotive is being Created in China
A Lone Voice in Support of America’s Strict AI Rules

A Lone Voice in Support of America’s Strict AI Rules

By Bolaji Ojo

China is ascendant. In everything. Short of a civil war, this reality is unstoppable.

So, why is America plunging ahead with plans to restrict Chinese access to advanced artificial intelligence technologies, processes and the semiconductor manufacturing equipment required to gain the associated benefits? Here’s why we agree that these actions are necessary and worthwhile, despite the flaws and the futility of achieving the totality of American objectives.

Read More »A Lone Voice in Support of America’s Strict AI Rules
Has US Export Control Lurched Towards AI Tyranny?

Has US Export Control Lurched Towards AI Tyranny?

By Peter Clarke

What’s at stake:

The future of the technology-based society and the world’s super-power landscape hang in the balance. A belief that control of AI development could determine winners and losers for decades has driven US bureaucrats to lay down an interim final rule (IFR) that seeks to control global access to AI technology. But in a globalized era, it is not clear that such measures will work. They may even be counterproductive.

One of the last acts of the Biden Administration was to issue yet another export control ruling – an interim final rule (IFR) – on AI chips, published on January 13, just days before the inauguration of President Trump.

This has not been debated in the US Congress, as the Department of Commerce has the authority to issue and enforce export control regulations under existing laws.

Read More »Has US Export Control Lurched Towards AI Tyranny?